We don’t want actual ObjectIds strewn around our code. It’s useful to testing code that uses things like Mongo’s ObjectId. That’s great for setting functions as method mocks. The gist of fineProperty use with a function value boils down to:Ĭonst obj = console.log(obj.yes()) // false or true depending on the call :D As you can see, the yes property is not enumerated, but it does exist. ![]() non-enumerable properties that are functions. This post goes through how to use fineProperty to mock how constructors create methods, ie. #javascript JavaScript fineProperty for a function: create mock object instances in Jest or AVA Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind its remote counterpart. No rebase(s): merge the remote branch into local We’re now going to explore how to achieve a state in the local branch where the remote won’t reject the push. How can you get your local branch back to a state that’s pushable? These 2 cases should be dealt with differently. There tend to be 2 types of changes to the remote branch: someone added commits or someone modified the history of the branch (usually some sort of rebase). “the tip of your current branch is behind its remote counterpart” means that there have been changes on the remote branch that you don’t have locally. Remotes are useful to share your work or collaborate on a branch. a GitHub/GitLab/BitBucket/self-hosted Git server repository instance). A remote equates roughly to a place where you git repository is hosted (eg. ![]() A remote branch is one that exists on the remote location (most repositories usually have a remote called origin). A local branch is a branch that exists in your local version of the git repository. Git works with the concept of local and remote branches. What causes ”tip of your current branch is behind”? Here is how it will look on your prompt once you've configured it: nick-macbook-air:~/dev/projects/stash$Īnd this is what you'll need to add to your. Wouldn't it be nice if you could see this information at your faithful command prompt? I thought so too so I started tapping with my bash chopsticks and cooked it up. Tip of the day: Ahead/Behind numbers in the promptĪfter a fetch, git status shows you how many commits you are ahead or behind of the synced remote branch. Rewriting history of shared repositories and branches is something you should NEVER do. Note: You should do this only when working with your own fork. ![]() Personally I prefer to keep the history as clean as possible and go for option three, but different teams have different workflows. You have a few options: git push -f origin feature-x Git checkout -b feature-x #some work and some commits happen #some time passes git fetch upstream git rebase upstream/main Publish with git forkĪfter the above steps, publish your work in your remote fork with a simple push: git push origin feature-xĪ slight problem arises if you have to update your remote branch feature-x after you've published it, because of some feedback from the upstream maintainers. In a standard setup, you generally have an origin and an upstream remote - the latter being the gatekeeper of the project or the source of truth to which you wish to contribute.įirst, verify that you have already setup a remote for the upstream repository, and hopefully an origin too: Let me start by detailing a common setup and the most basic workflow to interact with upstream repositories. Git upstream: Keep up-to-date and contribute In this blog, I’ll introduce you to the basics, the gotchas, and even leave you with a cool tip to get you ahead of the curve. To make sure all contributors are drawing from the same place, you’ll need to know some principles of how git forking interacts with git upstream. But if you’re not sending those changes back upstream-which means sending it back to the parent repository-you’re at risk for losing track of them, which can cause divergent lines in your repository. Forking projects to make your own changes lets you easily integrate your own contributions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |